Christianity and
Democracy:
It
has a lot to do with how Christians and Muslims relate to God in their
religious beliefs and practices. Historically, there is a reason why citizens
had more to say about their government and who represents with Christians in
the West than Muslims do in Islamic countries. A representative religion
fosters a representative government! Just as Jesus, who is fully God and fully
man, speaks on his Father’s behalf and as such, participates in his Father’s
authority, so too did the Apostles speak on Jesus’ behalf therefore
participating in his authority. And the Church? The ministry of the Church is
the continuation of that of the Apostles.
Jesus
Christ is a Judge and as such will come to judge the living and the dead. But
yet, Jesus appointed the Apostles as judges of the twelve tribes of Israel, the
Church: Jesus said to them, “Amen, I say to you that you who have followed me,
in the new age, when the Son of Man is seated on his throne of glory, will
yourselves sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”
(Matthew 19:28) Jesus is the Word of the
Father and his Word is therefore binding.
But the preaching of the Apostles is authoritative and binding as well:
Jesus also reminded them: “Whoever listens to you listens to me. Whoever
rejects you rejects me. And whoever rejects me rejects the one who sent me.”
(Luke 10: 16) And elsewhere he said to them: “Whatever you bind on earth shall
be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
From
the very beginning God allows man to participate in authority. After the Lord
had created the animals he allowed Adam to name the animals. Now, as we shall
see later, Allah is the kind of God that would name the animals himself; for he
is a master who allows not his slaves to participate in his authority.
This
biblically based religion of Catholicism is not only one of representation, but
mediation. It is sacramental in nature. The Church teaches that the pope, as
St. Peter’s successor, not only represents St. Peter the Apostle, but that St. Peter
continues to teach through him. What is also true is that the pope is the Vicar
of Christ. In the book of Revelation chapter 3, Jesus says, “The holy one, the
true, who holds the key of David, who opens and no one shall close, who closes
and no one shall open…” But although the Risen Lord holds the key, he
nevertheless gave the keys to the kingdom to St. Peter. (Matt. 16) Therefore,
as his vicar, the pope mediates the power of Christ’s authority for the benefit
of the whole Church. Jesus Christ’s prerogative to rule, sanctify and save is
not diminished in the least when the Church exercises those same powers.
And
finally, we come to the State as it is shaped by Christian principles. The
closer the State patterns its authority after that of parental and religious
authority, the more justly and effectively it will rule. Instead of a master
over a subject or slave, civil authority should be inspired by the principles
of justice and love. Love without
justice is anarchy. But justice without love is tyranny. And when the State sees itself as the
custodian of God’s authority, it will all-the- more likely respect the
boundaries in which it is obligated to function. When Europe was on the cusp of being menaced
with Socialism and Communism, when European governments ceased to recognize the
autonomy of the family and the individual, Pope Leo XIII wrote this in his
encyclical, Rerum Novarum:
The
Muslim relationship to Allah as master is much different than the Christian
relationship to God as Father. This difference has profound political
ramifications. It is why democracy struggles to find firm and deep roots in
Islamic soil.
Without
the coming of the Holy Spirit into the souls of Muslims, the words of our Lord
cannot apply to them: “I no longer
call you slaves, because a slave does not know what his master is doing. I have
called you friends, because I have told you everything I have heard from my
Father.” Unlike a son who shares in his
father’s inheritance and authority, Allah will forever remain a master who
imposes power upon his obedient subjects. His authority and power is to be
received from a distance and without question. There is no representation or
mediation of Allah’s power by Muslims; only obedience.
To
be sure, obedience to God- even without question -is a virtue. But without the
intimacy that the Holy Spirit confers on believers, the force of divine
authority and power can be like that of a stern master. This kind of
relationship between the Creator and the creature was characteristic of God’s
relationship with Israel in the Old Testament. This is why Islam- to this very day
-in its political governance, tribal vengeance and military warfare resembles
Old Testament Judaism more than New Testament Christianity.
If truth be told, the Old Testament world was a world where mercy was a sign of weakness and the strong arm of political power was a sign of strength. It was a time when freedom was the exception and an autocratic State was the rule. More than Judaism itself, Islam is the heir of Old Testament Judaism. Indeed, Allah's relationship with Muslims today bears a striking resemblance with Yahweh's relationship with the Jews several centuries ago. And it explains why Muslim countries favor totalitarian states.
In assessing the unrest in the Middle East, therefore, these theological considerations need to be brought to the fore. No doubt, politicians and members of the media who are inspired by the ideology of secularism will dismiss them, but we cannot. If we do, we do so at our own expense.
"An intelligent servant will rule over a worthless son, and will share the inheritence with the brothers." (Proverbs 17:2)
If truth be told, the Old Testament world was a world where mercy was a sign of weakness and the strong arm of political power was a sign of strength. It was a time when freedom was the exception and an autocratic State was the rule. More than Judaism itself, Islam is the heir of Old Testament Judaism. Indeed, Allah's relationship with Muslims today bears a striking resemblance with Yahweh's relationship with the Jews several centuries ago. And it explains why Muslim countries favor totalitarian states.
In assessing the unrest in the Middle East, therefore, these theological considerations need to be brought to the fore. No doubt, politicians and members of the media who are inspired by the ideology of secularism will dismiss them, but we cannot. If we do, we do so at our own expense.
"An intelligent servant will rule over a worthless son, and will share the inheritence with the brothers." (Proverbs 17:2)